Press Releases

RNZSPCA supports cosmetics animal testing ban

E-mail Print PDF

Media Release - 1 April 2015

RNZSPCA SUPPORTS COSMETICS ANIMAL TESTING BAN

 
The Royal New Zealand SPCA is delighted by Primary Industries Minister Nathan Guy’s announcement that the Government will amend the Animal Welfare Act to ban the use of animals for testing cosmetics .

“We’re very happy that the Government has listened to lobbying from the Green Party, the RNZSPCA, and other organisations to prevent the use of animals for cosmetic testing in New Zealand,” says Ric Odom, CEO of the RNZSPCA.

“Although we recognise that animal testing for cosmetics in New Zealand does not currently occur, we believe the amendment sends a clear message that animal testing for non-medical uses is unacceptable. Having said that, our position remains one of steadfast opposition to animal testing in any form unless it is for essential medical research and there is no alternative.

“However, we acknowledge that the total phasing out of animal testing will take time so in the meantime we continue to call for more rigorous justifications for the use of animal testing, the promotion of non-animal models by the Animal Ethics Committees, better reporting of animal deaths, and more humane treatment of animals involved in testing.

“The bottom line is that we strongly oppose any practice that causes animals unnecessary pain and suffering, including animal testing.”

For more information please contact: Ric Odom, Chief Executive Officer, Royal New Zealand SPCA, DDI: +64 9 825 1801, Mobile: +64 27 481 1300, Email: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

 

Woman left dog with 24-cm throat wound to get better on its own

E-mail Print PDF

Media Release - 11 February 2015

WOMAN LEFT DOG WITH 24-CM DOG WOUND TO GET BETTER ON ITS OWN

 
A Kaitaia woman who tied up a dog with wire causing a 24-cm gash in its throat and tied another dog to a clothesline with no shelter was sentenced today.

Chante Roycroft, 32, pleaded guilty in the Kaitaia District Court to the following charges relating to two separate dogs:

  • Failing to protect an animal from and rapidly diagnose any significant injury or disease.
  • Failing to ensure an ill or injured animal received treatment that alleviated any unreasonable or unnecessary pain or distress being suffered by the animal.
  • Ill-treatment of an animal causing the animal to suffer unreasonable or unnecessary pain or distress.
  • Refusing or failing to comply with requirement of Inspector to prevent or mitigate suffering of an animal.

She was sentenced to four months community detention, disqualified from owning companion animals for five years, and ordered to pay reparations of $84.83.

The court case results from a string of offences committed by Roycroft in early 2014, beginning on 3 April 2014 when she surrendered a brown female Staffordshire terrier type dog to the Far North District Council (FNDC). An FNDC Animal Control Officer gave the dog into the custody of the SPCA.

An SPCA Inspector and a veterinarian found the dog had a large, gaping, infected wound in its throat measuring 24cm long, 3cm wide, and 3cm deep. The veterinarian stated that the wound was consistent with wire being tied tightly around the dog's neck for a long time until it cut into the skin, which would have been very painful and distressing for the dog.

When interviewed, Roycroft produced a length of wire that had been used to tie up the dog. She had noticed the injury two days prior to the visit from the FNDC, but had not sought veterinary treatment because she had no money and the wound was “smelly”. So she left the dog to get better on her own.

On 22 May 2014, following a complaint made by a member of the public, the SPCA Inspector again attended Roycroft’s property. A young adult black and white male border collie type dog was tied up to the clothesline with no shelter. Roycroft was given the opportunity to forfeit ownership of the dog to the SPCA but refused.

The Inspector issued Roycroft with an official notice requiring her to provide adequate shelter for the dog by 24 May. However, when the Inspector returned on 26 May, the dog was still tied to the clothesline with no shelter.

Roycroft said she had no money and had been too busy to get a kennel for the dog. When given another opportunity to forfeit ownership of the dog to the SPCA, she again refused. So the Inspector took possession of the dog and Roycroft subsequently surrendered the dog to the SPCA.

“This is the kind of casual neglect of animals that the SPCA sees every day,” says Ric Odom, CEO of the Royal New Zealand SPCA.

“We are indebted to the local council and neighbours for alerting our Inspectors to the plight of these dogs. We can’t be everywhere and we mainly rely on the general public to keep their eyes open and report to the SPCA whenever they see neglect and/or abuse happening. The sad truth is that right now there are dogs and other animals tied up, helpless, neglected, or abused in back yards throughout New Zealand that we just don’t know about yet.”
 
p1010568 p1010569 
p1010583 img 0123
 

For more information please contact: Ric Odom, Chief Executive Officer, Royal New Zealand SPCA, DDI: +64 9 825 1801, Mobile: +64 27 481 1300, Email: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

Responsible dog ownership is not a matter of race says SPCA

E-mail Print PDF

Media Release - 26 January 2015

RESPONSIBLE DOG OWNERSHIP IS NOT A MATTER OF RACE SAYS SPCA

 
The Royal New Zealand SPCA strongly disagrees with Bob Kerridge’s recent comments in the media in which he links ethnicity with the high number of dog attacks in South Auckland.

“Bob’s comments are his personal views and do not reflect the views of the SPCA,” says Ric Odom, CEO of the Royal New Zealand SPCA, the national organisation that oversees 47 SPCA centres throughout the country, including Auckland.

“We would also like to clarify that Bob Kerridge does not speak for the SPCA as a whole – his position is Executive Director of SPCA Auckland only.

“Our staff, volunteers, and supporters include people from many different ethnic backgrounds who all share a common goal of advancing animal welfare in New Zealand. We proudly work with anyone who shares our common vision and would be horrified if Mr Kerridge’s comments led anyone to think that his personal views on ethnicity were shared by the SPCA. They are not.

“The SPCA believes responsible dog ownership is something every dog owner should practice regardless of their ethnicity or socio-economic status. If owners are not acting responsibly towards their animals we believe they should be held accountable, which is why we prosecute people accused of animal welfare offences.”

Responsible dog ownership includes training, socialising, registering, and desexing the dog, plus making sure the dog is not able to leave the owner’s property unrestrained.

“The onus is on dog owners to find out what their responsibilities are and act accordingly. Information about responsible animal ownership is freely available throughout the country from local councils and any one of our 47 SPCA centres so there really is no excuse for not doing the right thing,” says Mr Odom.

About the Royal New Zealand SPCA

The Royal New Zealand Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals is the national body that oversees the work of 47 SPCA Centres across the country to help advance the welfare of all animals in New Zealand by preventing cruelty to animals, alleviating suffering of animals, and promoting animal welfare policies through education and advocacy. The Royal New Zealand SPCA is a registered charity (Charities Commission number CC22705) and operates under the Animal Welfare Act 1999.

 

For more information please contact: Ric Odom, Chief Executive Officer, Royal New Zealand SPCA, DDI: +64 9 825 1801, Mobile: +64 27 481 1300, Email: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

Puppy falls from ute and is dragged, owner convicted

E-mail Print PDF

 

Media Release - 21 January 2015

PUPPY FALLS FROM UTE AND IS DRAGGED, OWNER CONVICTED

 
 
On 3 September 2014, 37-year-old Tauranga man Jarrod Wharekawa tied ‘Temtem’, his 5-month-old Staffordshire Terrier crossbred puppy, to the back of his ute and drove off. Somewhere down the road, Temtem jumped or fell off and was dragged along the road for some distance.
 
Wharekawa took the puppy to a vet clinic where the veterinarian observed that the flesh on its right hind leg had been ripped open to expose the bone, which had been snapped in two.
 
Tendons were severed or missing and the bone had been ground down significantly by the road surface. The skin on the puppy’s rear and other places on its body had been rubbed raw exposing the flesh underneath. The veterinarian suspected the pelvis was also fractured.
 
Wharekawa refused to accept the veterinarian’s advice that euthanasia was the best option to end the puppy’s suffering. So the puppy was released under strict instructions for it to be returned for further assessment the following morning. Following Wharekawa’s failure to return with the puppy, the clinic informed the Tauranga SPCA.
 
SPCA Inspector Jason Blair visited Wharekawa’s property later that day but was verbally abused by Wharekawa’s father and informed the puppy was dead. The Inspector applied for a search warrant and returned the next day to find the puppy still alive. The Inspector seized the puppy and took him to the vet clinic to be euthanised. By now the puppy’s wounds were malodourous and infected. Post-mortem radiographs confirmed that both hind legs and the pelvis were fractured.
Jarrod Wharekawa pleaded guilty yesterday in the Tauranga District Court to two charges: one of failing to protect his puppy from significant injury by tethering it on the back of his utility vehicle in such a manner that did not prevent it from falling or jumping off, and a second charge of keeping the puppy alive when it was it was suffering unreasonable or unnecessary pain or distress.
 
He was sentenced to 100 hours community work for each charge to run concurrently and ordered to pay reparations of $637.90.
 
According to Tauranga SPCA Inspector Jason Blair, the case is an example of an otherwise compassionate and responsible dog owner placing his puppy at risk by transporting him unsecured on the back of a vehicle and failing in his obligation to end the puppy’s suffering when severe injury occurred.
 
“The owner obviously didn't wish his puppy to be injured in the first place and his reluctance to return to the vet clinic may have been due to his not being able to face having his pet euthanised,” says Mr Blair.
 
“This does not, however, change the resulting severe suffering of the animal. Animal owners must be aware that they have a duty of care and protection over their animals and a responsibility to alleviate the pain of a suffering animal. The owner’s failings in this case were inexcusable and charges were laid accordingly.”
 
Royal New Zealand SPCA CEO Ric Odom says the SPCA and veterinarians see the consequences of animals falling from moving vehicles all too often and the resulting injuries are often horrific.
 
“Society has moved on from travelling with unrestrained children in the back of vehicles and we now need to extend the same sort of consideration to the safety of our animals. A ‘she’ll be right’ attitude can no longer tolerated when it comes to the transportation of animals on utes and other vehicles,” says Mr Odom.
 
“Recently developed codes of welfare around transporting animals reflect this shift in societal attitude. People that transport their animals in an unsafe manner run the very real risk of being prosecuted should injury occur.”
 
The Transport Within New Zealand Code of welfare (Minimum Standard No. 11 – Transport by Road) states:
 
Vehicles carrying animals must be operated in a manner that does not cause animals to fall or be injured during travel.
 
When being transported on the open rear of a light truck (such as a utility vehicle or flat-bed truck), dogs are best protected from the elements. They should be secured by attaching them close against the cab with a swivel between the securing point on the vehicle and the collar, and with the securing lead or chain long enough to permit the dog to stand and, lie down and move about but not of a length that allows the front or hind legs to reach the side of the tray when the animal is standing in a normal posture.
 
The Dog Code of Welfare (Minimum standard 20 – Transportation) states:
 
(d) Except for working dogs at work, dogs must not be carried on the open rear of a moving vehicle unless they are secured or enclosed in a crate.
 
The recommended best practice section provides further guidance stating in the same wording as the transport code that; When dogs are tethered on the back of an open vehicle for transport, the securing lead or chain should be long enough to permit the dog to stand, lie down and move about but short enough to prevent the dog’s legs from reaching the side of the tray so that it cannot fall off or enter the cab of the vehicle.
 
 
Press release 21 Jan 2015 2   Press release 21 Jan 2015 1
 ABOVE:  Injuries sustained by Temtem after being dragged behind the ute.
 
 
For more information please contact: Ric Odom, Chief Executive Officer, Royal New Zealand SPCA, DDI: +64 9 825 1801, Mobile: +64 27 481 1300, Email: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

SPCA welcomes glueboard traps ban

E-mail Print PDF

Media Release - 18 December 2014

SPCA WELCOMES GLUEBOARD TRAP BAN

The Royal New Zealand SPCA applauds the ban on the sale and use of glueboard traps in New Zealand.

Glueboard traps are boards with a sticky glue layer that are used to capture and hold live rodents. The SPCA considers the level of pain or distress caused to animals trapped on glueboards to be unreasonable and says that adequate alternatives are available.

“Once captured on a glue board, an animal is unable to free itself from the adhesive, and will generally bring more body parts into contact with the adhesive as it attempts to free itself. In doing so the animal will tend to further entrap itself,” says Ric Odom, RNZSPCA CEO.

“Animals may, in their attempts to free themselves, rip patches of fur out or break limbs. They may also defecate and urinate excessively from panic and distress.

“It gets worse. Unless animals that become stuck on glueboards are promptly killed using a humane method, they will be at increasing risk not only from injuries associated with escape attempts, but also from starvation, dehydration, exposure, possible injury through aggression from other animals, or suffocation if their muzzles become stuck in the glue,” says Mr Odom.

The ban under the Animal Welfare (Glueboard Traps) Order 2009 was announced yesterday by the Ministry for Primary Industries (MPI) and comes into effect from 1 January 2015.

“Glueboards are not an acceptable or humane way to control rodent populations. We welcome MPI’s announcement of their prohibition in New Zealand and we join with MPI in asking New Zealanders to keep an eye out for any glueboard rodent traps being used or sold in 2015. If you see any glueboard traps being sold or used, please report them to your local SPCA or MPI’s animal welfare hotline on 0800 008 333. Calls can be kept confidential if necessary.”

For more information please contact: Ric Odom, Chief Executive Officer, Royal New Zealand SPCA, DDI: +64 9 825 1801, Mobile: +64 27 481 1300, Email: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

Proposed caged chicken farm ‘backward step’

E-mail Print PDF

 

Media Release - 17 November 2014

PROPOSED CAGED CHICKEN FARM 'BACKWARD STEP'

The Royal New Zealand SPCA strongly opposes the proposed Craddock Farms colony cage chicken farm in Patumahoe, South Auckland and calls on Auckland Council to refuse resource consent.

The proposed farm would confine 310,000 layer hens in colony cages. Like SPCAs in the UK, US, and Australia, the RNZSPCA opposes the use of battery and colony cages for hens.

“Colony cages confine each bird into a area about the size of a piece of A4 paper, which means it can’t exhibit its normal behaviours and can’t do much except eat and lay eggs,” says Ric Odom, RNZSPCA CEO.

“We believe the establishment of this farm is a backward step that flies in the face of current trends towards improved animal welfare in the commercial farming of animals.

“The RNZSPCA supports an increasing number of free range layer and broiler chicken farms in New Zealand with our Blue Tick accreditation programme. Farms that win the right to display our Blue Tick are assessed by our third party auditors AsureQuality, including spot checks to ensure that they are meeting our high animal welfare standards.

“The proposed Craddock Farms colony cage facility in Patumahoe would not meet these standards because the 310,000 chickens at the farm would be confined in cages.”

For more information please contact: Ric Odom, Chief Executive Officer, Royal New Zealand SPCA, DDI: +64 9 825 1801, Mobile: +64 27 481 1300, Email: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

Page 1 of 15

«StartPrev12345678910NextEnd»

spca-centre-button

Upcoming Events

No events

About

khasiat mestinon | how to wean off sinemet | how much does cytotec pills cost | taking aygestin and still bleeding | http://rnzspca.org.nz/motilium/motilium-suppositories-discontinued/